User blog comment:BigBadBrad01/A Working Solution/@comment-902144-20100513013434

Alright, this blog entry is now going all over the place, and yeah, I know I'm contributing to that greatly, but sometimes it seems like my questions ain't gettin read, let alone answered, so since this was gonna definitely get some attention, I wanted get some crap off my chest and outta my own head.

Dave, I saw, no sweat, once the code can written so it doesn't do what it's doing in between edits, they can be easily replaced. I've only really used them on that page cause I knew they were gonna be trouble and possibly unwikiable. Some other solution needs be found to let the newbies know What MC6GLh with lemon on the side actually stands for.

As far as the variation exclusion comment I just read somewhere... my stand will continue to be, that if you include separate lines for 2 cars that look exactly the same, but have 1. different wheels, 2. different bases, 3. On a card or in a 5 pack; etc. then that card variation deserves it's own line, or all the casting pages that have 5 lines for the same issue because it came with 5 different wheels should be reduced to one line in the table with notes in the wheel column - and I don't like that method. I think each bonafide variation should be right in the version table. Nice try Brad, but I think this hard line stance against 1 line in the table with a picture of the differnt cards is overwhelmingly unreasonable.

In short, I still think the version table should have 1 line for each version (and no, I do not mean to include 1 line for each card change that comes mid season - although I wouldn't be against include that info SOMEWHERE - I know - some collectors want to know that and some collectors have tried to get each years cars on ONE card or the other - which has become impossible I believe)