Talk:Invader

card art

Please dont tell me we are going to start listing card variations under the casting versions, considering every single mainline car has multiple cards. Sinnin 06:26, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Considering the casting was changed dramatically, with the turret being cast solid and the missile eliminated, THIS card variation is a little more than a run of the mill card art change and therefore, in my opinion, worthy of it's own version. And considering some card variations go high on the secondary market, justification for it's inclusion as a different version shouldn't have to be debated. That funny car on a card comes to mind. ranugad 13:05, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

I just see it as a gallery image or as a note, I dont see that as excluded, try and guess what version the loose one is. as for the funny car, well that was a super rare car, that got diluted 5 years later when it was re-released. so the only reason the card is worth so much is because its the only way to prove the car is a 1990 rather then a 1995 Sinnin 20:22, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Go to Express Lane and tell me which year the base variation pictured in the gallery pertains to. And by your logic ANY and EVERY variation should be in the gallery with notes in the Notes section. I disagree, I think they should be listed in the Version section right where it needs to be when I go looking to see how many different ways my latest obsession came out before I discovered it's existence. If a wheel variation deserves it's own line, then card, color, tampo, etc deserves it's recognition as a different version. Are you going to be the head honcho who decides what level of difference between 2 releases qualifies for inclusion in the version table? In the future, I would appreciate any improvement you can make behind me, but denigrating my work by pushing what I, and other collectors consider variations, down to the gallery section feels like vandalism to me.

ranugad 22:38, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

You'll have to excuse me I was under the impression you were sane, But apparently you are not. Did you just respond to a third person, because I didnt say any of that! I understand the importance of seperate line entries for each different casting variation. I do not see a casting variation here, all i see is a comparison photo. Maybe im stupid but the layout of the wiki is 1 line entry with a unique photo for each version. you have supplied a photo of two card variations, and added the photo as a single casting variation. I didnt start this debate on an opinion, I started it on the fact that detailed comparison photos belong in the gallery, as all aspects of the table pertain to details of the actual car. And in this case the cars are identical. Sinnin 10:26, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

If it was just one person, I might ignore it, but when an administrator does it, I gotta ask, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!! No wonder you chased of Air!!

And ya know what makes it even worse Kenny? This:

Request For Deletion

So Hailey put a delete tag on the page, but didn't leave you a message, which was rude and thoughtless. But -- Hailey isn't an admin on that wiki.

That was said by Danny to you in regards to your request to be deleted without a trace from the Beatle wiki, in case you forgot. Now it's my turn to respond to your rudeness. 1. You should have put Dave in his place with his offhand, rude and demeaning comments - you failed as an admin. 2. You rudely dismissed my work without so much as a comment in spite of my response.

So now it's my turn to give you a taste of your own medicine and ask you to delete all the pictures I uploaded and edits from the wiki without a trace. Bob ranugad 02:55, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Pardon me, but I'm lost. Are you saying that it was I who chased off "Air" and was rude? I apologise for both things, but I don't know when I did it, how I did it or what I did. Sorry. Kenny HaarFager 04:27, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

It's no surprise you totally missed my point and avoided the real issue. Sidestepping befits you. It's amazing and now no suprise to me why the wiki is ignored by so many. ranugad 05:06, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot, I did not intend to specifically mean you in regards to Air, I meant the plural you in the wiki.ranugad 05:12, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't sidestepping anything, Bob, not intentionally. I merely want to reiterate my first sentence - "I'm lost." I'm not trying to accuse anybody of anything or make anybody mad. I am just trying to understand what you said or who said what. It's very confusing for me when lines run together and I can't figure out if something that was said was said by one user or another. That's why I think it's super critical that everybody uses the proper technique of when adding a comment, indent it by using one additional colon more than the comment above yours. I had a hard time figuring out what you were saying and when you were saying it. So, rather than try to make you mad at me for my simple not understanding what you said, let me just try to clarify what you said one point at a time so I can get it straight what you're saying or asking or accusing me of. What I think was your first point was this -

"If it was just one person, I might ignore it, but when an administrator does it, I gotta ask, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!! No wonder you chased of Air!!"

When just one person or an administrator does it - Does what exactly?

The more I think about this issue, it seems like you have issues with me. What are they exactly? What did I ever do to you? Explain them clearly, please.